<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Exploring the role of monitoring and evaluation in the effective implementation of DepEd programs and projects</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Bulata, Cherry Lita D.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">author.,</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>Foundation University (Dumaguete City)</namePart>
    <namePart>Graduate School,</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">degree granting institution.</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Dumaguete City</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Foundation University</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2026</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>x, 97 leaves : ill. (some color.,) ; 28 cm.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Abstract
This study sought to assess the implementation of monitoring and evaluation
(M&amp;E) to track the effectiveness and sustainability of the Department of Education
(DepEd) programs and projects. The researcher employed a descriptive-correlational
research design. Survey questionnaires were distributed to all school heads and
selected teachers from a sample of 25 public schools in Dumaguete City. The statistical
tools used in this study included the mean, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation
Coefficient, and the t-test. The study revealed that the extent of M&amp;E implementation
was perceived as "very high" by both school heads and teachers across all dimensions
considered. Moreover, the effectiveness and sustainability of DepEd programs and
projects were assessed by both school heads and teachers to a "very high" extent.
Additionally, the results indicated a statistically significant relationship between the
implementation of M&amp;E and its perceived effectiveness within the School Governance
and Operations Division (SGOD). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant
difference between the assessments of the two respondent groups regarding the
extent of M&amp;E implementation throughout the division. Lastly, the results of the study
revealed a significant difference in how school heads and teachers perceive the
effectiveness of M&amp;E activities. While both groups share similar perspectives on the
effectiveness of these activities under the SGOD, they express these views with
varying degrees of magnitude.
Keywords: DepEd programs, effectiveness, M&amp;E, monitoring, evaluation, school heads,
teachers</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">by by Cherry Lita D. Bulata</note>
  <note>Thesis graduate (Master of Arts in Education Major in Administration and Supervision) - - Foundation University, 2026.</note>
  <note>Includes bibliographical references and appendices.</note>
  <subject>
    <topic>Educational evaluation</topic>
    <topic>Rating of</topic>
    <geographic>Philippines</geographic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>School management and organization</topic>
    <geographic>Philippines</geographic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Educational accountability</topic>
    <geographic>Philippines</geographic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Educational planning</topic>
    <geographic>Philippines</geographic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Department of Education (Philippines)</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="lcc">GS (MAED-AdmSp-Th) LG 221 D35 G73 A6 E38 A36 . 2026 B85</classification>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">Foundation University </recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">260519</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260519165156.0</recordChangeDate>
    <languageOfCataloging>
      <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
    </languageOfCataloging>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
