000 03698nam a22004217a 4500
003 OSt
005 20260519165156.0
008 260519b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _cFoundation University
_aFoundation University
_beng
_dFoundation University
050 _aGS (MAED-AdmSp-Th) LG 221 D35 G73
_bA6 E38 A36 . 2026 B85
100 _aBulata, Cherry Lita D.
_97977
_eauthor.,
245 _aExploring the role of monitoring and evaluation in the effective implementation of DepEd programs and projects /
_cby by Cherry Lita D. Bulata
260 _aDumaguete City :
_bFoundation University ,
_c2026.
264 _42026.
300 _ax, 97 leaves :
_bill. (some color.,) ;
_c28 cm.
_3thesis
_fleaves
336 _3rdacontent
_atext
_btxt
337 _3rdamedia
_aunmediated
_bn
338 _2rdacarrier
_3GS-MAED-AdmSp-Th
_avolume
_bnc
490 _aGS-MAED-AdmSp-Th
502 _6Thesis graduate (Master of Arts in Education Major in Administration and Supervision) - - Foundation University, 2026.
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and appendices.
520 _aAbstract This study sought to assess the implementation of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) to track the effectiveness and sustainability of the Department of Education (DepEd) programs and projects. The researcher employed a descriptive-correlational research design. Survey questionnaires were distributed to all school heads and selected teachers from a sample of 25 public schools in Dumaguete City. The statistical tools used in this study included the mean, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient, and the t-test. The study revealed that the extent of M&E implementation was perceived as "very high" by both school heads and teachers across all dimensions considered. Moreover, the effectiveness and sustainability of DepEd programs and projects were assessed by both school heads and teachers to a "very high" extent. Additionally, the results indicated a statistically significant relationship between the implementation of M&E and its perceived effectiveness within the School Governance and Operations Division (SGOD). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference between the assessments of the two respondent groups regarding the extent of M&E implementation throughout the division. Lastly, the results of the study revealed a significant difference in how school heads and teachers perceive the effectiveness of M&E activities. While both groups share similar perspectives on the effectiveness of these activities under the SGOD, they express these views with varying degrees of magnitude. Keywords: DepEd programs, effectiveness, M&E, monitoring, evaluation, school heads, teachers
650 _aEducational evaluation
_xRating of.
_912571
_zPhilippines
650 _aSchool management and organization
_912572
_zPhilippines
650 _aEducational accountability
_912573
_zPhilippines.
650 _aEducational planning
_912574
_zPhilippines.
650 _aDepartment of Education (Philippines).
_912575
658 _aThesis Writing 2 (Pre/Final Oral Defense :
_bAdministration and Supervision, Master of Arts in Education ;
_cMA 101
690 _aDepEd programs,
_916366
_2FU
690 _aeffectiveness,
_916367
_2FU
690 _aM&E,
_916368
_2FU
690 _amonitoring,
_916369
_2FU
690 _aevaluation,
_916370
_2FU
690 _aschool heads,
_916371
_2FU
690 _2FU
_ateachers
_9163
710 _aFoundation University (Dumaguete City).
_bGraduate School,
_edegree granting institution.
_912576
942 _2lcc
_cTH
_n0
_hLG 221 D35 G73
_iA6 E38 A36 2026 B85
_kGS (MAED-AdmSp)
999 _c6057
_d6057